Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the mobile Agnew Relationship Measure (mARM-C)
摘要: 检验移动阿格纽关系问卷中文版(mARM-C) 的信、效度。采用mARM-C及效标问卷测量574名近期使用过冥想APP的大学生,两周后抽取102名重测。通过探索性因子分析及网络分析发现,该问卷包括5因子共19个条目;验证性因子分析也表明模型拟合良好,且效标关联效度、聚敛效度、区分效度良及内部一致性信度均达到心理测量学标准。因此,mARM-C信效度良好,可用来测量在线自助干预中用户与程序间的数字治疗联盟。
Abstract: In order to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the mobile Agnew Relationship Measure (mARM-C), 574 university students who had recently used meditation apps were recruited to complete both the mARM-C and criterion measures. After two weeks, a subset of 102 of these participants were retested. The exploratory factor analysis and network analysis results revealed that the mARM-C comprised 19 items across five factors. Further confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the five-factor model was a good fit, and the questionnaire exhibited satisfactory criterion-related validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and good internal consistency reliability, which met the criteria for psychological measurement standards. These results indicate that the mARM-C is a reliable and valid instrument, capable of measuring the digital therapeutic alliance between users and programs in internet-based self-help interventions.
[V1] | 2023-05-27 18:18:40 | ChinaXiv:202305.00228V1 | 下载全文 |
1. 系统合理信念维护心理健康:缓和作用与拓展 | 2023-09-23 |
2. The intersubjective interaction in psychoanalysis: Enlightenment from Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue | 2023-09-19 |
3. “惩前毖后”与“率先垂范”:第三方干预行为的影响效应 | 2023-09-18 |
4. 贝叶斯方差分析在JASP中的实现 | 2023-09-18 |
5. 加工需求驱动下词汇阅读神经通路的动态协作机制 | 2023-09-14 |
6. 第三方惩罚行为的认知神经机制 | 2023-09-13 |
7. 身份尴尬与身份辩护:劳务派遣员工组织身份发展过程 | 2023-09-12 |
8. 自我参照的神经成像认知本体论数据集 | 2023-09-12 |
9. 阅读研究中常用眼动控制模型的对比分析 | 2023-09-12 |
10. 债务的心理和行为后果及其机制 | 2023-09-12 |