Subjects: Statistics >> Social Statistics submitted time 2023-12-03 Cooperative journals: 《中国科学院院刊》
WANG Fang
SHEN Jinsheng
WU Hong
HUANG Jinxia
YANG Baolong
RUI Xiao1 GUO Jinjing
LI Yanzhang
ZHAO Zhanyi
CHEN Yufei
LI Shixin
QI Shuo
Abstract： Cultivating more strategic scientists is an important proposition for achieving a high level of self-reliance in science and technology in China. In response to the the central government’s requirements, and to support the “selection, cultivation, and retention” of strategic scientists, this study comprehensively adopts various research methods of the competency model. Based on 155 typical cases of benchmark figures at home and abroad, a quantitative analysis index system of typical characteristics of strategic scientists is constructed, and 720 leading talents from 297 State Key Laboratories are selected as representatives of the reserve force of strategic scientists for empirical analysis of the index system. The study found that compared with the benchmark figures, there are significant gaps in strategic vision and practical ability, a weak force of enterprise strategic scientists, and a mismatch between the disciplinary distribution and the strategic development needs of China among the representatives of China’s reserve force of strategic scientists. Based on this, relevant countermeasures and suggestions are proposed.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-10-08 Cooperative journals: 《知识管理论坛》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] Academicians are the main and elite force to promote the development of science and technology in China, the research on its growth rule and development history has great significance for the discovery and cultivation of talents in China. [Method/ process] By the CV analysis method, this paper comprehensively collected information on academicians, and carried out the quantitative research on the temporal and spatial characteristics, academic structure characteristics of the academician group. [Result/conclusion] This paper explores the basic characteristics and the factors affecting the achievement of academician group. Then, it puts forward the rationalization suggestions for talent training in the new era.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-06-26
Abstract： [Purposes] The development of global open publishing is analyzed to provide decision-making basis for management personnel at all levels.
[Methods] Based on SCIE data and website information of each OA journal, statistical analysis was conducted on the global publication of OA journals, author publications, and APC reasonableness, as well as the OA publications and APC expenditures of authors in China.
[Findings] In 2022, 7,759 global OA journals were indexed in SCIE, an increase of 15% compared to 2021. APC reasonable journals account for 66%. The global OA publication volume has increased by 6%, with Chinese authors accounting for 29% of the total OA publication volume. Chinese authors have published 269,800 articles in 4,936 OA journals, with an APC expenditure of approximately RMB 4.3 billion yuan, an increase of 44% and 43% respectively compared to 2021. The National Natural Science Foundation of China is the main fund supporting Chinese authors to publish OA papers, with an annual APC expenditure increase of 33%.
[Conclusions] OA publishing has become the mainstream of global publishing, and China's OA publication volume and APC expenditure have both grown rapidly, tending towards international full-OA journals with low APC and high publication volume. In China, the construction of Sci-Tech journals market and the performance management of research fund need to be promoted in time to adapt to the development of open access.
Peer Review Status:
Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-04-01 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] Grasping the development and abnormal situation of global OA Sci-Tech journals' APC in time is helpful to avoid the loss of domestic research funding, assist decision-making, and provide a reference for China to determine the development path for open access and open science.[Method/process] This paper used the least square method to fit the functional relationship between the APC unit price and influence index of OA journals, and set a 95% confidence interval to identify premium journals and non-premium journals. Based on this principle, a global OA Sci-Tech journals' APC monitoring and anomaly early warning model was established.[Result/conclusion] The model includes automatic acquisition, monitoring analysis, and anomaly early warning modules. Take OA journals data published by an institute of physics in the Chinese Academy of Sciences as an example, it was found that premium journals accounted for 43.5%, and 4.46% of abnormal APCs required early warning. However, 90% of the papers were published in non-premium journals with high cost performance, and non-premium journals were not in the Beall's List, premium journal classification conforms to the inclusion of GoOA and DOAJ,which verified the validity and reliability of the model.
Subjects: Other Disciplines >> Synthetic discipline submitted time 2023-03-31 Cooperative journals: 《农业图书情报学报》
Abstract： [Purpose/Significance] The development of open science still faces many data ethical problems, and there is an urgent need to explore the ethical guidelines for data handling that are compatible with the open science innovation ecology. The establishment of ethical guidelines is essential to create a favorable open science innovation ecology for data handling that match the construction of open science innovation ecology, and guide the participants in the open science innovation ecology to act in accordance with legal regulations and ethical norms in the process of data creation, sharing, dissemination, and utilization, and restraining data handling behaviors for the good and benefit of society. [Method/Process] This study first uses literature research and content analysis, based on relevant laws, guidelines, draft frameworks, policies and typical data management models on data handling ethics, from a universal perspective, based on the practice of data acquisition, storage, management, use and destruction, for social data in a broad sense, while taking into account a part of scientific research data, correlating and integrating different guidelines, seeking common themes and contents among existing guidelines, and summarizing the general dimensions and highly recognized guidelines. This study summarizes the general dimensions of ethical guidelines for data handling and the contents of the guidelines with high recognition. Second, this study combines the concept of open science and the needs of national social development, and distills the needs of ethical guidelines for data handling in the open science innovation ecosystem from the latest domestic planning policies and the connotation of open science. Finally, this study synthesizes and compares the two results through matrix analysis, and analyzes the framework of ethical guidelines for data handling in the construction of open science innovation ecology from the perspectives of commonality and characteristics, and synergy between guideline contents and policies and concepts. [Results/Conclusions] The existing ethical guidelines for data handling have high applicability in the open science innovation ecology, but still need dynamic expansion. Combining the concept of open science and the development needs of national society, this study proposes a framework of ethical guidelines for data handling in the open science innovation ecology, including three dimensions and 15 elements of long-term governance, coordination and order, and systematic science, aiming to serve the further development of the text of ethical guidelines for data handling adapted to the development of the open science innovation ecology in China and to provide some reference for data management in institutions.
Subjects: Other Disciplines >> Synthetic discipline submitted time 2023-03-31 Cooperative journals: 《农业图书情报学报》
Abstract： [Purpose/Significance] Open science is shaping a new academic innovation ecology, aiming to promote open exchange and use of knowledge, emphasize open and cooperative research methods, and thus accelerate scientific innovation. Open innovation emphasizes the flow of knowledge across organizational boundaries. Both of them have obvious internal consistency and regard the free flow of knowledge as the driving factor of innovation. However, there are few studies on the relationship between open science and open innovation at present. They are often studied separately in the scientific research environment and the enterprise environment, ignoring the common role and integration of the two in the open innovation ecology. This paper aims to analyze the consistency of the connotation of open science and open innovation, study the mechanism of open science for innovation ecology, and provide reference for building an open science innovation ecology integrating open science and open innovation, as well as for developing open science governance for scientific and technological innovation. [Method/Process] First, based on the existing connotation of open science, this paper established the connotation analysis framework of "resource-process-subject-behavior" of open science, and put forward four key elements and principles of open science: "openness of scientific knowledge resources - transparency of research process - inclusiveness of participants - collaboration of research behavior". Then it de-constructed open innovation according to the connotation analysis framework of open science, and put forward four key elements of innovation knowledge resources, innovation process, innovation subject and innovation activities, as well as the principle of transparent and open innovation knowledge resources and innovation process, and value of co-creation based on the inclusiveness of innovation subject. Finally, according to the four principles of open science, the "Open Science Spectrum" was established to clarify the consistency and synergy of both sides from the perspective of openness. Besides, in order to understand the joint action mechanism of open science and open innovation in the innovation ecology, this paper analyzes the open science innovation mechanism in different innovation stages from the perspective of innovation process, including the open science mechanism in the open science research stage, the mechanism in the technology research and development stage, the citizen science mechanism in the social inclusion stage, and the responsible innovation mechanism covering the whole process of innovation. [Results/Conclusions] The innovation ecology of open science has come into being. Open science and open innovation have consistency in connotation and synergy in openness. Under the open science innovation ecology, open science plays a role in different stages of innovation. Explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge are open and flowing in different stages of innovation, accelerating open science innovation, open innovation, public innovation and responsible innovation. The inadequacy of this paper is that the relevant research is still at the theoretical level. For example, the spectrum of open science needs to be refined to an assessable and operable granularity, and the mechanism of open science for innovation ecology also needs more cases to verify. At the same time, based on this research, we need to further explore the governance mechanism of open science under the innovation system and the linkage strategy of science, industry, society and policy under the open innovation ecology.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2022-10-28
Abstract： Purpose/Significance Open science is shaping a new academic innovation ecology, aiming to promote open exchange and use of knowledge, emphasize open and cooperative research methods, and thus accelerate scientific innovation. Open innovation emphasizes the flow of knowledge across organizational boundaries. Both of them have obvious internal consistency and regard the free flow of knowledge as the driving factor of innovation. However, there are few studies on the relationship between open science and open innovation at present. They are often studied separately in the scientific research environment and the enterprise environment, ignoring the common role and integration of the two in the open innovation ecology. This paper aims to analyze the consistency of the connotation of open science and open innovation, study the mechanism of open science for innovation ecology, and provide reference for building an open science innovation ecology integrating open science and open innovation, as well as for developing open science governance for scientific and technological innovation. Method/Process First, based on the existing connotation of open science, this paper established the connotation analysis framework of "resource-process-subject-behavior" of open science, and put forward four key elements and principles of open science: "openness of scientific knowledge resources - transparency of research process - inclusiveness of participants - collaboration of research behavior". Then it de-constructed open innovation according to the connotation analysis framework of open science, and put forward four key elements of innovation knowledge resources, innovation process, innovation subject and innovation activities, as well as the principle of transparent and open innovation knowledge resources and innovation process, and value of co-creation based on the inclusiveness of innovation subject. Finally, according to the four principles of open science, the "Open Science Spectrum" was established to clarify the consistency and synergy of both sides from the perspective of openness. Besides, in order to understand the joint action mechanism of open science and open innovation in the innovation ecology, this paper analyzes the open science innovation mechanism in different innovation stages from the perspective of innovation process, including the open science mechanism in the open science research stage, the mechanism in the technology research and development stage, the citizen science mechanism in the social inclusion stage, and the responsible innovation mechanism covering the whole process of innovation. Results/Conclusions The innovation ecology of open science has come into being. Open science and open innovation have consistency in connotation and synergy in openness. Under the open science innovation ecology, open science plays a role in different stages of innovation. Explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge are open and flowing in different stages of innovation, accelerating open science innovation, open innovation, public innovation and responsible innovation. The inadequacy of this paper is that the relevant research is still at the theoretical level. For example, the spectrum of open science needs to be refined to an assessable and operable granularity, and the mechanism of open science for innovation ecology also needs more cases to verify. At the same time, based on this research, we need to further explore the governance mechanism of open science under the innovation system and the linkage strategy of science, industry, society and policy under the open innovation ecology.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2017-09-29
Abstract：[目的/意义]全球开放获取期刊的发展越来越受重视，持续关注全球开放获取期刊的进展为我国开放获取期刊的发展提供参考和借鉴。[方法/过程]对2016年世界重要开放获取期刊利益相关者，包括政府机构、科研资助机构、科研教育机构、出版商、国际组织、学/协会等进行动态跟踪和扫描，整理并分析2016年全球开放获取期刊的最新发展趋势和热点问题。[结果/结论]2016年全球开放获取期刊繁荣发展，并得到多方利益相关者的支持和推动，开放获取期刊的发展也面临一些问题和挑战，如开放获取期刊的质量问题、巨型开放获取期刊的未来发展问题。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Physics >> General Physics: Statistical and Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Information, etc. submitted time 2017-09-20
Abstract：通过对20家开放获取期刊出版社网站信息的调研，梳理出与开放获取期刊再利用有关的权益信息，并进一步归纳出当前OA期刊权益政策的三种主要类型，包括开放获取政策、网站使用政策、批量数据获取政策，以及分析了政策内容对图书馆开放获取期刊建设带来的影响和图书馆可采取的对策。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2017-08-15
Abstract：通过对20家开放获取期刊出版社网站信息的调研，梳理出与开放获取期刊再利用有关的权益信息，并进一步归纳出当前OA期刊权益政策的三种主要类型，包括开放获取政策、网站使用政策、批量数据获取政策，以及分析了政策内容对图书馆开放获取期刊建设带来的影响和图书馆可采取的对策。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2016-06-20
Abstract：[摘 要] 开展开放科技资源建设对促进科技资源的传播和利用，提升图书馆的信息服务能力有重大意义。[摘 要] 开展开放科技资源建设对促进科技资源的传播和利用，提升图书馆的信息服务能力有重大意义。当前5个著名的国外开放科技资源建设项目（OPENDOAR、BASE、PMC、eDOC及PLOS）在资源发现及获取、质量控制、利用机制、服务开发4个方面均可资借鉴。我国图书馆在开展开放科技资源建设时，除了要汲取国外经验，还要注重开放科技资源的评价和遴选、完善开放资源的利用机制、重视开放资源的长期保存。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Hits
Hits
Downloads
Comment
YES