Abstract:
In recent years, as a
novel perspective to explain employee voluntary turnover and retention, job
embeddedness has provided insights into the forces of why people stay on the
job and has received considerable attention from scholars and practitioners.
According to the PRISMA statement and content analysis, 176 papers from
databases of domestic and foreign were reviewed. The PRISMA statement consists of
four steps, identification, screening, eligibility and Inclusion in turn. Then
a comprehensive review about the consequences of job embeddedness was conducted
based on theoretical perspectives, content analysis, and future directions.
Accordingly, six theoretical explanations were summarized, including
conservation of resources theory, social capital theory, planned behavior
theory, work - role attachment theory, future time perspective, and contagion
process model. Using content analysis, the research tendency of job
embeddedness and its consequences with multi-perspective were displayed.
Totally speaking, first, compared with other theoretical perspectives, the
conservation of resources theory may clarify the mechanism of individual job
embeddedness more comprehensively in that it not only explains individuals’
resources utilization and allocation in dealing with job demands, but also
predicts their behaviors of resource investment. Second, contagion process
focuses on the interaction process between individuals and social context.
Based on the turnover contagion perspective, under low job embeddedness
situation, like the contagion of illness, employees' willingness to leave may
induce coworkers’ intention to quit. On the contrary, guided by social information
processing theory, perceived supervisor job embeddedness as pivotal signals and
contagion cues would promote subordinates’ job embeddedness and their devotion
of working time and energy, which in turn could form the positive “contagion of
embeddedness”. Third, according to planned behavior theory, individuals’
turnover behavior depends on their intention to leave. Individuals with higher
levels of job embeddedness means an good alignment with the organization. Such
an individual - oraganization fit along with high turnover costs would hinder
their intention to leave. Fourth, future time perspective and work - role
attachment theory highlight employees’ expectation or attachment to the
organization, which would attract them to stay and engage in greater amounts of
behaviors beneficial to organizations. Fifth, draw upon social capital
perspective, once high job embeddedness employees are to start a new venture,
the social capital accumulate from prior working experience would contribute to
entrepreneurial performance. However, those social capital to some extent may
delay their entrepreneurial decision and progress. Future research should first
make further efforts to propose a theoretic model on team job embeddedness,
identify the parallel transmission path of “member - member” and the vertical
transmission path of “leader - subordinate” of job embeddedness, so as to
investigate the effectiveness of team job embeddedness more comprehensively.
Second, focus on the spillover effect under cross - culture comparison.
Strengthen the research on the spillover effects of job embeddedness to the
family domain, and further explore the similarities and differences of job
embeddedness spillover effects in different cultural backgrounds under
cross-culture comparison. Third, highlight the double - edged sword effect of
job embeddedness. Focusing on the perspective of “too much of a good thing”
effect can provide a more profound and dialectical understanding of the job
embeddedness theory, and also reveal the potential cost of its negative
effects. Finally, it is advisable to emphasize the differentiation effects of the
sub - dimensions of job embeddedness. Distinguish the advantage of each sub -
dimension and find out the strongest predicting effects corresponding to
different sub-dimensions. At the same time, clarify the boundary conditions of
the cross effects of sub-dimensions, and analyze the underlying mechanisms of
the strengthening or weakening effects of different dimensions.