Subjects: Library Science,Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2016-03-29
Abstract:摘要:开放期刊再利用过程中存在一系列权益问题,包括机器采集、本地存储、具体再利用方式合理性缺摘要:开放期刊再利用过程中存在一系列权益问题,包括机器采集、本地存储、具体再利用方式合理性缺乏依据等,源于相关主体权益关系中的冲突。这些相关主体包括作者、出版商、再利用者、资助机构、行业组织等。基于权益关系的分析,提出图书馆开放期刊再利用全流程,包括期刊采集、存储、组织及再利用服务、数据调用等环节面临的主要权益问题和对应的解决方法。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science,Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2016-03-14
Abstract: [Objective] To understand Chinese users' cognition and usage of the arXiv preprint platform, as well as their opinions and suggestions on the development of arXiv. [Methods] Based on a questionnaire survey of teachers, researchers and postgraduate groups in 9 domestic universities and scientific research institutions, the author obtained 510 survey data, and used SPSS and other analytical tools to analyze the survey data. [Results] The results show that the awareness of arXiv by Chinese researchers is not very high, but domestic researchers who are familiar with arXiv have realized that publishing papers on arXiv is an important means to occupy the first publishing rights of results and solicit peer opinions. [Limitations] The survey sampling is limited to member units of the China arXiv Service Working Group, and arXiv users of non-member units are not included. 【Conclusion】In order to allow arXiv to benefit more scientific research in my country, the China arXiv Service Working Group needs to take more active actions to accelerate the wider and in-depth application of arXiv in China.
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science,Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2016-03-10
Abstract:文章对图书馆领域的主流资源发现平台(Elsevier,Springer,中国知网 CNKI)和商业资源发现系统(Primo,Summon,EDS)的页面构造和页面布局等方面进行了多层次多角度的分析,并对多个平台(如Willy,英国国家图书馆,荷兰国家图书馆,美国国会图书馆,美国 NSDL,OCLC,PubMed等)的特色资源和功能进行调研分析,最终借助上述平台的优秀功能,改进我中心自行建设的资源集成发现服务系统,并着重提升用户使用体验。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science,Information Science >> Philology submitted time 2016-03-10
Abstract:提出用于描述科技文献核心知识的“研究设计指纹”概念,综合研究分析了相关的科技文献规范描述框架,创建“基于科技文献的研究设计指纹描述框架”,以增强科技文献的机器计算可执行性、知识粒度性、知识关联性、结构的扩展性以及研究设计思路的可视性,为科研人员快速发现研究设计方法、研究设计工具等指纹提供了新的思路与方法。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review