Subjects: Digital Publishing >> Internet Journals submitted time 2024-01-26
Abstract： Purposes This paper analyzes the misconduct performances of processing of sporadic retraction papers and large-scale retraction papers in CNKI, Wanfang and Weipu databases, and gives some suggestions to solve the problems in order to provide references for standardizing retraction papers processing of databases. Methods Through investigating the misconduct performances of processing the 404 sporadic retraction papers which 370 withdrawal statements corresponded and large-scale retraction papers in the three databases of CNKI, Wanfang and Weipu, the number of papers were counted in each database: that retraction statements should have been published but not yet, deleted directly after the retraction statements published, without standardized processing after the retraction statements published, directly deleted without publishing retraction statements, directly marked the retraction papers marks without publishing retraction statements and without any processing in the databases of retraction papers in other databases. Findings In CNKI, Wanfang and Weipu databases, the number of retraction papers that retraction statements should have been published but not respectively is 282, 205, 135; directly deleting after retraction statements published respectively is 58, 97, 213; without regularly processing after retraction statements published respectively is 104, 189, 265; directly deleting without publishing retraction statements respectively is 119, 96, 77; directly marking retraction papers signs without publishing retraction statements respectively is 72, 0, 0; doesn’t do any processing in this database that retraction papers in other databases respectively is 91, 109, 58. Conclusions The relevant departments should formulate a withdrawal standardization documents, strengthen retraction papers supervision of databases, and the datebases should enhance the awareness of retraction statements standardization, establish and perfect the statements system, so as to strengthen the governance of academic misconduct and promote the construction of scientific research integrity.
Subjects: Digital Publishing >> Internet Journals submitted time 2024-01-23
Abstract： Purposes This paper analyzes the misconduct performances of processing of sporadic retraction papers and large-scale retraction papers in CNKI, Wanfang and Weipu databases, and gives some suggestions to solve the problems in order to provide references for standardizing retraction papers processing of databases. Methods Through investigating the misconduct performances of processing the 404 sporadic retraction papers which 370 withdrawal statements corresponded and large-scale retraction papers in the three databases of CNKI, Wanfang and Weipu, the number of papers were counted in each database: that retraction statements should have been published but not yet, deleted directly after the retraction statements published, without standardized processing after the retraction statements published, directly deleted without publishing retraction statements, directly marked the retraction papers marks without publishing retraction statements and without any processing in the databases of retraction papers in other databases. Findings In CNKI, Wanfang and Weipu databases, the number of retraction papers that retraction statements should have been published but not respectively is 282, 205, 135; directly deleting after retraction statements published respectively is 58, 97, 213; without regularly processing after retraction statements published respectively is 104, 189, 265; directly deleting without publishing retraction statements respectively is 119, 96, 77; directly marking retraction papers signs without publishing retraction statements respectively is 72, 0, 0; doesn’t do any processing in this database that retraction papers in other databases respectively is 91, 109, 58. Conclusions The relevant departments should formulate a withdrawal standardization documents, strengthen retraction papers supervision of databases, and the datebases should enhance the awareness of retraction statements standardization, establish and perfect the statements system, so as to strengthen the governance of academic misconduct and promote the construction of scientific research integrity.
Subjects: Digital Publishing >> Internet Journals submitted time 2023-05-05
Abstract：【目的】分析知网、万方、维普404篇撤销论文存在的问题，针对问题出建议，以期为学术不端治理提供参考。【方法】通过三大中文期刊数据库检索到370篇撤稿声明，分析对应的404篇撤销论文期刊分布、学科类型分布、对期刊评价影响、撤销论文、被撤销论文、发表当年被撤销论文年度分布、撤销论文年篇均滞后月数、被撤销论文年篇均滞后月数、整体撤销论文和医药卫生类撤销论文的撤稿原因、撤销论文被引情况。【结果】医药卫生类撤销论文占比最高；撤销论文篇数对期刊影响因子及其是否被核心期刊数据库收录没有非常显著的影响；2020、2021年撤销论文数量远远大于被撤销论文数量，撤销论文年篇均滞后月数在波动中缓慢增大，被撤销论文年篇均滞后月数逐渐减少；整体撤销论文和医药卫生类撤销论文都是学术不端撤稿原因占比最高；学术不端检测系统使用后10年的被撤销论文、学术不端撤稿原因比使用前15年分别增加206篇、155条；知网撤销论文可检篇次、被引篇次、被引频次在三个数据库中都最多，撤销后论文被引情况严重。【结论】解决撤销论文问题，需对科研人员开展学术道德培训，编辑部要制定执行严格的规章制度、提高编辑识别防范学术不端论文的水平和能力，数据库要严把论文录入关、规范处理撤销论文，相关部门要完善惩戒机制和评价体系、创建全国通用的稿件追踪平台、设立专门的问题论文审查部门。
Hits
YES
Hits
Downloads
Comment