Your conditions: 谢君绮
  • The choice of Equivalent Dose Fitting Function in ESR Dating of Old Fossil samples

    Subjects: Nuclear Science and Technology >> Other Disciplines of Nuclear Science submitted time 2024-06-24

    Abstract: [Background]: In ESR dating of old fossils, the Double Saturation Exponential (DSE) function is often used for the equivalent dose (DE) determination, it generally requires more than 15 dose points and the maximum irradiation dose (Dmax) of >20kGy to ensure the fitting accuracy, which limit the practical application of dating old fossils by ESR method with insufficient sample size. [Purpose]: This study attempts to explore the feasibility and reliability of using the single saturation exponential (SSE) fitting function to fit fewer dose points with lower Dmax to obtain the DE values of the fossil teeth from pre-Early Pleistocene sites, and compared with the ones determined by DSE function of 17 fossil samples from the late Miocene to the early Pleistocene. [Methods]: First, we compared the DE values obtained by three fitting functions (DSE, SSE and EPL-exponential plus linear) by the additional dose method. Then, the influence of different Dmax on the DE results is investigated. Finally, the artificially regenerative dose-response curves fitted by the three functions with the weighted mean ESR signal intensity of the dose points were compared. [Results]: This study showed that (1) the DE results of SSE and EPL functions are systematically higher than those of DSE function under the same condition as Dmax=50kGy and 15 dose points, and the fitting accuracy of former two functions is better than that of DSE function in general. (2) For samples with DE>4500Gy and DE<4500Gy, the results of SSE and DSE are basically consistent within the error range under the conditions of Dmax≥6.5*DE and 1.3*DE<Dmax<2.2*DE, respectively, which can provide the recommended dose value of Dmax for samples with DE>2000Gy when using SSE function. (3) For fossil samples with DE<4500Gy, the SSE function can be used to fit the 11 dose points with Dmax≤10kGy, and the DE results are generally consistent with the DSE function within the error range. (4) The artificially regenerative dose-response curves of the weighted mean ESR signal intensity of the sample dose points showed that the DSE function had the best goodness of fit at 15 dose points, and the goodness of fit between the SSE and DSE function tended to be close at 11 dose points. [Conclusions]: Based on our study, it is viable to use SSE function to perform DE fitting on old fossil samples under certain Dmax/DE conditions. In the further study, we will try the fragmental analysis of the fossil teeth for DE determination and to establish the standard growth curve of old fossils established by the DE values obtained by SSE and DSE functions and compared with conventional additive dose method to explore its feasibility.