Subjects: Astronomy >> Astrophysical processes submitted time 2023-02-19
Aikaterini Vandorou
Lisa Dang
David P. Bennett
Naoki Koshimoto
Sean K. Terry
Jean-Phillipe Beaulieu
Christophe Alard
Aparna Bhattacharya
Joshua W. Blackman
Tarik Bouchoutrouch-Ku
Andrew A. Cole
Nicolas B. Cowan
Jean-Baptiste Marquette
Clément Ranc
Natalia Rektsini
Abstract： We present the analysis of high resolution follow-up observations of OGLE-2016-BLG-1195 using Keck, four years after the event's peak. We find the lens system to be at $D_L = 6.87\pm 0.65$ kpc and comprised of a $M_{\rm p} = 9.91\pm 1.61\ M_{\rm Earth}$ planet, orbiting an M-dwarf, $M_{\rm L} = 0.57\pm 0.06\ M_{\odot}$, beyond the snow line, with a projected separation of $r_\perp=2.62\pm 0.28$ AU. Our results are consistent with the discovery paper, which reports values with 1-sigma uncertainties based on a single mass-distance constraint from finite source effects. However, both the discovery paper and our follow-up results disagree with the analysis of a different group that also present the planetary signal detection. The latter utilizes Spitzer photometry to measure a parallax signal. Combined with finite source effects, they claim to measure the mass and distance of the system to much greater accuracy, suggesting that it is composed of an Earth-mass planet orbiting an ultracool dwarf. Their parallax signal though is improbable since it suggests a lens star in the disk moving perpendicular to disk rotation. Moreover, parallaxes are known to be affected by systematic errors in the photometry. Therefore, we reanalyze the Spitzer photometry for this event and conclude that the parallax signal is not significantly greater than the instrumental noise, and is likely affected by systematic errors in the photometric data. The results of this paper act as a cautionary tale that conclusions of analyses that rely heavily on low signal-to-noise Spitzer photometric data, can be misleading.
Peer Review Status:
Awaiting Review
Hits
Hits
Downloads
Comment