Subjects: Digital Publishing >> Internet Journals submitted time 2024-04-02
Abstract: Purposes This article conducts a survey on the overall development level of research institutions engaged in the field of academic journal publishing in China, reflecting the industry’s practice and understanding of academic journal publishing think tanks, revealing the development trend of academic journal publishing think tanks in China, with the aim of promoting research on academic journal publishing think tanks and consulting services for academic journal publishing think tanks, and providing reference for relevant policy formulation in the field of academic journal publishing. Methods We conducted a survey on institutions conducting research in the field of journal publishing,including academic journal editorial departments, academic journal associations, relevant departments of universities, research institutes related to academic journals and enterprises related to academic journals.We used statistical analysis and case analysis methods to analyze and explore the current development status and existing problems of academic journal publishing think tanks, and put forward strategies to enhance the influence of academic journal publishing think tanks. Findings Overall, the output of think tank research results in the field of journal publishing is low, and they are rarely adopted by decision-makers. The scale and size of practitioners are small, and the funding source for think tank research is single. The function of journal publishing think tanks has not been effectively utilized. However, there is still significant room for development in the construction of academic journal publishing think tanks in China. Conclusions It is suggested that relevant management departments strengthen guidance on the development of the journal think tank industry. Research institutions in the field of journal publishing should strengthen the transformation of achievements and expand funding sources, clarify the strategic positioning of think tank research, establish benchmark institutions, strengthen the cultivation of think tank research literacy among journal practitioners, use intelligent journal data platform tools to carry out think tank research, and strengthen communication and cooperation between different publishing think tanks.
Subjects: Library Science,Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2017-11-05 Cooperative journals: 《智库理论与实践》
Abstract:2016年5月28日,在“上海论坛2016”开幕之际,《智库理论与实践》编辑部就“巴西智库相关问题”参访了前来参会的巴西瓦加斯基金会(FGV)智库专家雷纳托教授,以期进一步了解巴西智库整体情况和特点以及FGV世界顶级智库的发展态势。鉴于访谈仅为一家之言,而且时间有限,因此,本文内容不尽全面,尚需甄别和考量,仅供参考。
Subjects: Library Science,Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2017-11-05 Cooperative journals: 《智库理论与实践》
Abstract: [Purpose/significance] This paper aims to provide a theoretical basis and reference for building a new think tank with Chinese characteristics. With an insight into the research of think tanks in recent years in China, this paper summarizes the major research findings of think tanks by domestic scholars and analyzes the main features of think tanks research in China. [Method/process] This paper employs the bibliometric analysis method, excel, and citespaceIII to analyze the features of domestic think tanks research, namely, the growth in the number, journal, institute, author, high cited literature and research content. [Result/conclusion] Firstly, the think tanks research in China has been very promising with more attention paid to the problem of domestic think tanks research. Secondly, there seems to be a lack of professional journals in which think tanks research can be published. Thirdly, the research institutes of think tanks are mainly based in colleges and Academy of Social Sciences systems. Last but not least, domestic scholars seem to pay more attention to American think tanks, university think tanks and the construction of think tanks.
Subjects: Library Science,Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2017-07-13 Cooperative journals: 《智库理论与实践》
Abstract:中国科学院作为首批国家高端智库建设试点单位,凝聚整合全院研究力量,组建成立了具有法人地位的中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院(以下简称"战略咨询院")。在首批国家高端智库建设试点工作开展一周年之际,我刊就战略咨询院如何立足科技特色开展智库研究、进行战略布局等问题对战略咨询院院长、中国发展战略学研究会理事长潘教峰进行了访谈。潘院长以其战略视野和宽广的思维,结合长期从事战略研究和重大规划的实践经验,创造性地提出了DIIS智库研究方法,并向读者分享了他对智库
Subjects: Library Science,Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2017-07-13 Cooperative journals: 《智库理论与实践》
Abstract:入围山东省第一批省科协国家级科技思想库研究基地,成为青岛地区唯一的公益型综合性科技信息和科技发展战略研究咨询服务机构,青岛市科学技术信息研究所积极响应时代、国家和社会发展的需要,不断转变和强化发展战略,努力向一流思想库迈进。关注科技、经济与社会的热点问题,针对政府和社会关心的重点、难点问题积极组织开展专题研究,靠实力发声,用行动面向未来。
Subjects: Library Science,Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2017-07-13 Cooperative journals: 《智库理论与实践》
Abstract:智库有多种类型,其中社会智库(又称民间智库)是我国正在兴起并引人关注的一种新的智库类型,在中国特色新型智库建设中扮演极为特殊而重要的角色。由于国情的差异,中国的智库与西方智库有诸多不同,但社会智库的定位和功能正在中国智库发展中凸显其与众不同的作用。本期,我们采访中国社会智库的典型代表——重庆智库理事长王佳宁研究员,他就我们关心的一系列问题做了解答。重庆智库的经验也许对国内各类智库均具有一定的启示意义。
Subjects: Library Science,Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2017-07-13 Cooperative journals: 《智库理论与实践》
Abstract:[目的 /意义]梳理我国智库过去若干年的研究情况,追踪国内学者的智库研究成果,总结国内智库研究的主要进展,分析国内智库研究的主要特点,为建设中国特色新型智库提供理论依据和参考借鉴。[方法 /过程]运用文献计量分析方法、excel、Citespace III工具对中国智库研究的特点进行分析,分析内容包括:文献增长态势、期刊分析、机构分析、作者分析、高被引文献分析、研究内容分析等。[结果 /结论 ]我国智库研究问题已经开始得到高度关注,智库研究正进入佳境。发表智库成果的学术期刊比较分散,研究智库的机构主要为大学和社科院系统,我国学者对美国智库、大学智库、智库建设的关注度较高。
Subjects: Library Science,Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2017-07-13 Cooperative journals: 《智库理论与实践》
Abstract:美国智库一直被人们称为国家的思想库、政府外脑、美国精英思想的经纪人、美国总统的智囊团。2015年10月18日,借美国著名智库学家斯特鲁伊克先生来中国的机会,《智库理论与实践》编辑部就"美国智库的有关问题"对他进行了访谈,以期进一步贴近美国智库,了解美国智库运作机制,如何通过资政和问政影响美国政府决策等问题。由于访谈只是一家之言,且时间有限,所谈内容不够全面、系统,还远不足以洞悉美国智库的更多特点,有些内容尚需甄别和评判,仅供参考。
Subjects: Library Science,Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2017-07-13 Cooperative journals: 《智库理论与实践》
Abstract:2015年11月10日,在中国社会科学院召开"第二届全国人文社会科学评价高峰论坛"之际,我们有幸采访了出席此次会议的安德鲁·里奇博士,就美国智库影响力、质量保障和人员评价等相关问题进行了简要而愉快的访谈,以期为我国智库界带来美国资深智库专家的真实声音。