Research on the Evaluation of Intellectual Property Transformation Policies under the Framework of Four-dimensional Analysis：Quantitative Analysis Based on Policy Texts postprint

Abstract: ［Purpose/significance］By establishing an evaluation system for intellectual property rights transformation policies, the paper provides reference basis for government departments to formulate scientific and reasonable intellectual property transformation policies, and promotes the development of national intellectual property rights.［Method/process］ On the basis of content analysis and coding of intellectual property transformation policies, a four-dimensional analysis framework is established to determine the evaluation index system of intellectual property transformation policies. Using policy quantification standards and entropy weight TOPSIS model, the six selected intellectual property transformation policies are measured and evaluated. ［Result/conclusion］ The results indicate that among the evaluation indicators of intellectual property transformation policies,the policy objective evaluation indicator has the greatest impact on the evaluation of intellectual property transformation policies, while the weight difference between policy intensity, policy tools, policy objectives, and policy action objects is relatively small among the evaluation indicators of intellectual property transformation policies. The policy tool evaluation indicator has the smallest impact on the evaluation of intellectual property transformation policies. In addition, the comprehensive ranking results of the six policies show that “the Opinions of the Ministry of Education, the China National Intellectual Property Administration, the Ministry of Science and Technology on Improving the Quality of Patents in Colleges and Universities and Promoting the Transformation and Application” is relatively ranked at the top, while “the Notice on Implementing the Special Plan for Patent Transformation to Assist the Innovative Development of Small and Medium sized Enterprises” and “the Notice of the General Office of the Ministry of Education on Carrying out the Special Supervision of the Implementation of Policies for the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements” are relatively behind. Finally, based on the research results, it identifies the shortcomings of the study and proposes corresponding policy recommendations.