Research on The Knowledge Transfer Effect of Scientific Collaboration Based on Trust Mechanism
摘要: 目的/意义 信任是维持科学家相互合作的关键因素，并会使科学家之间产生知识传递，使知识由个人所有传递为多人共有，进一步促进科学发展。对信任机制导向的知识传递进行研究，有助于科研合作者信任关系的维护，促进知识传递，从而推动科学进一步发﹡展。 方法/过程 本文首先利用美国物理学会数据集（APS）对科研合作者的信任程度进行量化，分析合作者之间的信任分布规律；然后，将科研合作者间的知识传递划分为隐性知识传递与显性知识传递，梳理合作网络中知识传递的路径；最后，利用回归分析对合作者之间信任程度对知识传递量的作用效应进行验证。 结果/结论 科研合作者之间的基础信任与知识传递有着明显的时序共振规律；产生隐性传递的合作团队比产生显性传递的合作团队的信任程度更低；显性传递与信任程度的相关性更高，但依赖性更低。本研究将对科研合作信任情感的研究扩展到信任行为上，通过量化科研合作者之间的信任程度，减少了在合作横截面中测量静态信任的局限。
Abstract: Purpose/Significance Trust is a key factor in maintaining collaboration and will result in knowledge transfer between scientists. It enables knowledge transfer from individual ownership to multi-person sharing and further promotes scientific development. The study of trust mechanism-oriented knowledge transfer can help the maintenance of trust relationship among scientific collaborators and promote knowledge transfer, thus facilitating the further development of science. Methods/Process In this paper, we first quantified the trust of scientific collaborators using the American Physical Society dataset (APS) and analyzed the trust distribution pattern among collaborators. Then, the knowledge transfer between research collaborators is classified into implicit and explicit, and the paths of knowledge transfer in the collaborative network are sorted out. Finally, regression analysis is used to verify the effect of trust among collaborators on the amount of knowledge transfer. Results/Conclusions The basic trust and knowledge transfer between scientific collaborators had a clear pattern of temporal resonance. Collaborative teams that generated implicit transfer had lower trust. Explicit transfer was more correlated with the trust, but implicit transfer was more dependent on. By clarifying the influence of trust mechanisms on knowledge transfer in scientific research collaboration, this study extends the study of trusting emotions to trusting behaviors. By quantifying the trust between scientific collaborators, the limitations of measuring static trust in a cross-section of collaboration are reduced.
| [V1] | 2023-05-22 22:18:05 | ChinaXiv:202305.00164V1 | 下载全文 |
| 1. 数智赋能辽宁省高校图书馆全民阅读高质量发展——从“以书为中心”到“以人为中心”的实践路径谈起 | 2023-09-25 |
| 2. 公共物品“还原”“重构”全民阅读观：内涵、方法及路径 ——从学术史上“空谈误国”与“实干兴邦”两种阅读推广观谈起 | 2023-09-25 |
| 3. 古籍整理视域下《古今图书集成》编纂时间考辨——以1934年第四次印本“中华书局版”为底本 | 2023-09-25 |
| 4. 标准·精细·反启蒙：中国式现代化图书馆高质量发展视域下21世纪前20年对阅读推广的反思 | 2023-09-25 |
| 5. 基于Citespace的我国大学生信息素养教育可视化分析 | 2023-09-25 |
| 6. 中国生物医学期刊申请国际数据库收录的策略与探析——以《中国癌症杂志》杂志为例 | 2023-09-22 |
| 7. A Conversation with ChatGPT: Scientific Research in the Age of AI | 2023-09-22 |
| 8. 对话ChatGPT：AI时代的科学研究 | 2023-09-22 |
| 9. 基于关联数据的机构知识库实体学术关系发现方法研究 | 2023-09-21 |
| 10. 中国医学期刊国际化现状与展望——国际数据库收录中国生物医学期刊的探析与启示 | 2023-09-20 |
相关信息
待评议
点击量
下载量
