The Application of Paper-level Classification System inJournal’s Discipline Distribution Analysis
摘要: 摘要:【目的】期刊学科布局是我国期刊建设现阶段的关键问题之一,为解决期刊层次学科分类体系在学科布局分析中的局限性,本文拟引入论文层次学科分类体系。【方法】采用对比分析的方式,对论文层次学科分类体系在期刊布局相关研究中的优势进行了例证。【结果】在期刊学科分布分析中,论文层次分类体系有效揭示了综合类期刊Nature和Science Bulletin以及专业综合期刊Science China-Chemistry和Journal of the American Chemical Society之间的明显学科分布差异和学科侧重。在学科演化分析中,我们通过论文层次分类体系的挖掘,揭示了Sensors从围绕传感器相关研究为主,拓展成为跨多个学科领域研究内容的期刊。针对期刊主题重叠的分析,我们发现《海洋学报》和《大气科学进展》这两本属于不同学科的期刊在诸多研究主题上存在重叠。在期刊影响力分析中,我们以JCR统计学和概率领域期刊为例,分析了两种分类体系下的期刊影响力排名差异,论文层次分类体系能更有效消除学科内部的引用差异,为期刊影响力评估提供更好客观的分类参考。【结论】相较于期刊层次分类体系,论文层次分类体系以论文为单位进行分类,粒度细、更新快、更加适用于期刊学科布局的研究实践。
Abstract: Purposes Journals discipline distribution is one of the key issues in the current stage of developing journal in china. In order to solve the limitations of the journal-level discipline classification system in the analysis of journals discipline distribution, this article intends to introduce a paper-level discipline classification system. Methods The comparative analysis was used to exemplify the advantages of the paper-level discipline classification system in the research related to journals discipline distribution. Results In the analysis of journals discipline distribution, paper-level discipline classification system effectively revealed the obvious discipline distribution differences and discipline emphasis between the multidisciplinary journals Nature and Science Bulletin, the Science China-Chemistry and Journal of the American Chemical Society. In the analysis of the discipline evolution, through the mining of the paper-level discipline classification system, we revealed that Sensors has expanded from focusing on sensor-related topics to across multiple disciplines. Based on the analysis of the overlap of journal topics, we found that Acta Oceanologica Sinica and Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, which belong to different disciplines, overlap in many research topics. In the analysis of journal impact, we take JCR Statistics Probability journals as examples to analyze the difference in journal impact rankings under the two classification systems. The paper-level classification system can more effectively eliminate citation differences within disciplines, and provides a better objective classification reference for journal impact evaluation. Conclusion Compared with the journal-level discipline classification system, the paper-level discipline classification system classifies the paper as a unit, with fine granularity, fast update, and more suitable for the research practice of journals discipline distribution.
[V2] | 2022-07-27 15:09:34 | ChinaXiv:202112.00001V2 | 下载全文 |
[V1] | 2021-11-29 16:59:34 | ChinaXiv:202112.00001v1 查看此版本 | 下载全文 |
1. 数智赋能辽宁省高校图书馆全民阅读高质量发展——从“以书为中心”到“以人为中心”的实践路径谈起 | 2023-09-25 |
2. 公共物品“还原”“重构”全民阅读观:内涵、方法及路径 ——从学术史上“空谈误国”与“实干兴邦”两种阅读推广观谈起 | 2023-09-25 |
3. 古籍整理视域下《古今图书集成》编纂时间考辨——以1934年第四次印本“中华书局版”为底本 | 2023-09-25 |
4. 标准·精细·反启蒙:中国式现代化图书馆高质量发展视域下21世纪前20年对阅读推广的反思 | 2023-09-25 |
5. 基于Citespace的我国大学生信息素养教育可视化分析 | 2023-09-25 |
6. 中国生物医学期刊申请国际数据库收录的策略与探析——以《中国癌症杂志》杂志为例 | 2023-09-22 |
7. A Conversation with ChatGPT: Scientific Research in the Age of AI | 2023-09-22 |
8. 对话ChatGPT:AI时代的科学研究 | 2023-09-22 |
9. 基于关联数据的机构知识库实体学术关系发现方法研究 | 2023-09-21 |
10. 中国医学期刊国际化现状与展望——国际数据库收录中国生物医学期刊的探析与启示 | 2023-09-20 |